Official Community Plan Review
About the Official Community Plan (OCP)
Since the fall of 2020, there have been a variety of opportunities for the public to provide input into the first phases of updating the Official Community Plan (OCP). Hundreds of North Saanich residents have participated through online surveys, workshops, and meetings, providing valuable feedback about how the community might change over the next 20 years.
We are in Phase 3: Drafting the OCP
Subscribe for project updates (see "Stay Informed" on the right) or check back for more details.
About the Official Community Plan (OCP)
Since the fall of 2020, there have been a variety of opportunities for the public to provide input into the first phases of updating the Official Community Plan (OCP). Hundreds of North Saanich residents have participated through online surveys, workshops, and meetings, providing valuable feedback about how the community might change over the next 20 years.
We are in Phase 3: Drafting the OCP
Subscribe for project updates (see "Stay Informed" on the right) or check back for more details.
What questions do you have about this project?
You may have questions about what is included in an Official Community Plan. You may have questions about how a Official Community Plan is reviewed. You may even have questions about how your input will be used! If you have a question, feel free to ask it here. Our staff will respond to your questions as soon as possible.
-
Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linkedin Email this link
I completed your survey however one of the fundamental failings was a lack of background and context provided by the Project Team to help me understand. It was a very frustrating process trying to figure out what your intention was. Some of the questions I felt were to trick me into agreeing to new housing, hubs and nooks. I am not a mind reader and with this survey I had to try to think of what your meaning was. This was a very poor survey which to me was a developer creating confusion for their own benefit.
aeanders asked over 1 year agoThank you for you feedback. We are sorry to hear you had a frustrating time completing the survey. We specifically prepared a Phase 3 Engagement Background Materials document, hosted on our project page in advance of the spring 2022 engagement. We hope that you were able to join us at one of the three open houses to have any additional questions answered. As we do not yet have a draft plan, we do not have all the details, these were intended to be high-level policy directions to gather community feedback at this point in the process. All feedback from the engagement activities will be collated into an engagement summary and will help shape the recommendations to Council on how to proceed with drafting the OCP. Please subscribe for project updates to stay informed.
-
Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linkedin Email this link
Is there any plan to add washroom facilities or portable outhouses on the Flight Path trail? We would love to use it but lack of bathroom options precludes the opportunity. At a minimum, there should be two locations on this 9-10 km trail, one at the playground area - one opposite end of trail. Thanks in advance for your response,
Cathy asked about 2 years agoThank you for your question.The Flight Path is on Victoria Airport Authority (VAA) property. The VAA has been identified as a stakeholder and we are collaborating with them as part of the OCP review process. We would highlight that a portable outhouse is available at Patricia Bay Park, across from the Flight Path and West Saanich Road. Thanks again for your interest in the OCP review, please subscribe for project updates to stay informed.
-
Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linkedin Email this link
I read your somewhat generic responses to quite a few credible questions around the clear cutting on Moses Point, where you do not give an answer to the simple question that `that should not have happened`. Your new OCP will inevitably further deforest areas. For more affordable housing and in line with one of the previous questions where a owner wanted to follow the given zoning and subdivide this was disallowed? Why cannot existing zoning be looked at before further deforestation, noting however the requirement for more infrastructure. North Saanich has a relatively (up to now) well managed and low property taxation, yet the required extra infrastructure will place the burden on existing owners? The OCP review has a mandate to look at quite a few issues, and indeed receive feedback from the public, however it would appear that the owner/residents feedback is not fed into what we see?
Malcolm asked about 2 years agoThank you for your questions and comments. We are currently in Phase 2 of the OCP review. Some of the initial policy directions regarding forests and tree cover that were developed in Phase 2 in response to what we heard through engagement include:
Enhance Forests and the Tree Canopy
- Douglas-fir & Garry Oak ecosystem enhancement and conservation
- These two unique and critical ecosystems have faced tremendous stress over the years as urban growth, development, roads, logging, agriculture and more have contributed to the loss and fragmentation of habitat and native species.
- Tree protection bylaw
- A revised tree protection bylaw could support the protection, preservation and conservation of trees on private property, including their physical, societal, economic and environmental characteristics
- Community Forest Strategy
- Given the diversity of neighbourhoods and landscapes across North Saanich, a Forest Management Strategy could help identify important tree stands and unique tree canopies while tailoring conservation and enhancement strategies for each.
We are currently preparing to report back to Council on November 22 with a revised Phase 2 engagement summary and revised schedule, budget and detailed plan for further engagement with the public on the OCP themes for Phase 3 (Drafting the Plan). Phase 3 will include more technical analysis regarding the land use options and associated infrastructure. Please also visit the Tree Protection Bylaw review page and subscribe for project updates to stay informed.
- Douglas-fir & Garry Oak ecosystem enhancement and conservation
-
Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linkedin Email this link
Has anyone considered transforming four-way intersections into round-a-bouts? Traffic circles are MUCH safer and improve traffic flow. Please think about it.
Mary-Anne Neal asked about 2 years agoThank you for your question and comment. The Transportation Association of Canada released the Canadian Roundabout Design Guide in 2017. This guide provides Canadian jurisdictions with comprehensive information and guidance to the planning, design, construction, operation, maintenance and safety of roundabouts. In the District of North Saanich we evaluate traffic improvements based on data and would not preclude a 'roundabout' when considering changes to a traffic intersection.
-
Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linkedin Email this link
Thank you for clarifying my question about Queen Mary's Bay Neighbourhood Nook being for a cafe or serving shop. I presume this would be similar to the Fickle Fig on Mills Road. A further question about Queen Mary's Bay.... I thought it was listed as "Special Development" and zoned for residential (24 acres = 40+ lots), so is it still on the table that this could be parkland and boat launch with this Neighbourhood Nook instead? I am in total disagreement with more density aka residential lots on this land.
Valerie Edwards asked over 2 years agoThank you for your follow-up question. The current OCP outlines the justification for Queen Mary Bay as a special development area and includes policy statements and planning principles (Section 13.5). As part of the OCP review we will look at the special development areas and consider whether the policies still align with the community's vision. Please subscribe for project updates to stay informed.
-
Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linkedin Email this link
What is meant by a neighbourhood hub at Queen Mary Bay please?
VE asked over 2 years agoThank you for your question. The purpose of the neighbourhood nook concept is to allow a neighbourhood serving shop or café use within a walking distance of residential areas. These locations were selected based on their proximity to existing or planned bike routes, bus routes, and as a gathering place for residents.
-
Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linkedin Email this link
As a resident of NS I wrote a letter to the district regarding the intersection of Wain Road and West Saanich. I continue to believe that this location is in dire need of a four way stop or a lighted intersection. There is no stop sign or lighted intersection from Brentwood Bay to Lands End. In my opinion this area is considered the township of North Saanich. With the firehall, gas station, corner store, church and a school all on the stretch of two blocks I would hope others would feel that the best way to ensure safety and traffic calming in a busy hub would be to address this intersection. My son rides his bike to school and has told me on many occasions how the thru traffic on West Saanich has neglected to stop for him to walk his bike across. It is not unusual for traffic to be backed up well down Wain Road on most days causing further frustration for drivers. The landscape of that corner also has a terrible blind corner where by a driver is one full car length past the stop sign in order to even see oncoming traffic speeding up West Saanich. The reply I was given by North Saanich stated that a traffic study would be done to determine the validity of a change. I have not seen any indication that this has been done to date. It was upsetting to see that this was not addressed at all in the current planning departments proposals. Clearly North Saanich is working towards satisfying the growth in the area and I would like to know the justification for not addressing this.
Jen Dahl asked over 2 years agoThank you for your comments and question. This intersection is currently under review by District staff to determine if additional treatment is merited. We rely on the Transportation Association of Canada guidelines in the Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices which is used across Canada as a reference for roadway treatments. For the intersection at Wain Road and West Saanich Road we are most interested in the overall volume, volume split between legs, pedestrian count and speed. We typically use collected data for rational to augment roadway treatment. Staff are planning on completing a warrant analysis late this year.
-
Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linkedin Email this link
The draft OCP calls for neighbourhood nooks, community hubs, and village nodes. Is there any consideration given to the increased traffic volume, parking, noise and disturbance in the affected communities? Surely, if a village was needed, it should be surrounding the Municipal Hall on an existing busy road, Mills Road.
Joseph asked over 2 years agoThank you for your question. Building on what we've heard, the OCP Design Workshop resulted in the initial emerging concepts. Further technical analysis will take place in the Fall to analyze the limitations and/or implications of some of the concepts, this will lead to further refinements and additional engagement as we begin to draft the OCP. Please subscribe for project updates to stay informed.
-
Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linkedin Email this link
Why are you proposing potential seniors' housing behind Panorama Rec? Originally a library was intended, but now this has turned into housing? This feels like a bait and switch for residents in the area, especially when this was deemed ALR land and now has an exclusion. It could set a dangerous precedent for other ALR land areas that could turn into housing.
Concerned Resident asked over 2 years agoThank you for your comments and question. One of the emerging concepts that we are gathering initial feedback on is the McTavish Village Centre concept, that includes the Panorama site. Please join us at one of our June pop-up events to provide initial feedback on the emerging concepts. In-depth engagement on the emerging concepts will take place in Fall. Please subscribe for project updates to stay informed.
-
Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linkedin Email this link
Is there any plan to include the intersection of McTavish Rd and East Saanich . This area is prime for some sort of development and has been vacant since the old house burnt down, looks like about 4 acres for possible commercial with residential on top
mbrady asked over 2 years agoThank you for your question. One of the emerging concepts that we are gathering initial feedback on is the McTavish Village Centre concept. Please join us at one of our June pop-up events to provide initial feedback on the emerging concepts. In-depth engagement on the emerging concepts will take place in Fall. Please subscribe for project updates to stay informed.
Follow Project
Documents
-
Staff Report: OCP Review - Phase 3 Engagement Summary & Recommendations Report (August 15, 2022) (29.8 MB) (pdf)
-
Phase 3 Engagement Summary - Council Presentation (August 15, 2022) (7.75 MB) (pdf)
-
High-Level Review of Current OCP (May 2022) (393 KB) (pdf)
-
Phase 3 Drafting the OCP
-
Phase 2 Community Visioning and Exploration of Emerging Concepts
-
Technical Memo - Land Use Analysis (November 2021) (42.5 MB) (pdf)
-
Council Presentation Slides (March 21, 2022) (1.89 MB) (pdf)
-
Council Presentation Slides (January 31, 2022) (515 KB) (pdf)
-
Council Presentation Slides (December 6, 2021) (6.24 MB) (pdf)
-
Phase 2 Engagement Summary and Policy Directions Report (November 2021) (74.6 MB) (pdf)
-
Council Presentation Slides (November 22, 2021) (1.87 MB) (pdf)
-
OCP Council Workshop Maps (September 22, 2021) (42.1 MB) (pdf)
-
OCP Council Workshop Slides (September 22, 2021) (10.1 MB) (pdf)
-
Phase 2 Council Presentation Slides (July 12, 2021) (64.7 MB) (pdf)
-
Post It Notes Transcribed Pop Up Events (June 2021) (301 KB) (pdf)
-
Pop-Up Display Boards (June 2021) (19.1 MB) (pdf)
-
Mentimeter Comments Transcribed from OCP Design Workshop (May 2021) (1.08 MB) (pdf)
-
OCP Design Workshop Open House Slides (May, 19, 2021) (3.13 MB) (pdf)
-
OCP Design Workshop Distinct Character Areas Workshop Slide (May 17, 2021) (8.03 MB) (pdf)
-
Web Panel Discussion Key Themes (April 2021) (154 KB) (pdf)
-
Property Responsibility on the Waterfront Presentation (March 2021) (338 KB) (pdf)
-
Peninsula Area Agricultural Commission Presentation (March 2021) (453 KB) (pdf)
-
North Saanich Residents Association Q&A (January 2021) (201 KB) (pdf)
-
District Staff Presentation to NSRA (January 2021) (1.78 MB) (pdf)
-
CSC Presentation (January 27 2021) (18.9 MB) (pdf)
-
CPC Presentation (January 21 2021) (18.3 MB) (pdf)
-
CAC Presentation (January 19 2020) (18.6 MB) (pdf)
-
Phase 2 Engagement Plan DRAFT (December 2020) (276 KB) (pdf)
-
Complete Communities DRAFT (December 2020) (715 KB) (pdf)
-
Natural Systems DRAFT (December 2020) (174 KB) (pdf)
-
Housing & Affordability DRAFT (March 2021) (368 KB) (pdf)
-
Climate Action DRAFT (December 2020) (236 KB) (pdf)
-
Agriculture & the Food Sector DRAFT (December 2020) (242 KB) (pdf)
-
Jobs & the Local Economy DRAFT (December 2020) (187 KB) (pdf)
-
Discussion Papers Introduction DRAFT (December 2020) (134 KB) (pdf)
-
-
Phase 1 Background Research and Project Scoping
-
2020-12-14-OCP Phase 1 and Next Steps Council Presentation PowerPoint (34.9 MB) (pdf)
-
OCP Phase 1 Engagement Summary DRAFT (December 2020) (12.1 MB) (pdf)
-
OCP Pop Up Display Boards (October 2020) (36 MB) (pdf)
-
Community Profile Official Community Plan Baseline Conditions Report - September 2020 (4.94 MB) (pdf)
-
-
Staff Reports
-
Staff Report: RGS Background Report in relation to the OCP Review (July 11, 2022) (2.31 MB) (pdf)
-
Staff Report: OCP Review Phase 3 Engagement Materials (May 2, 2022) (37.5 MB) (pdf)
-
Staff Report: Revised Phase 3 Work Plan, Engagement Plan and Budget (March 21, 2022) (66 MB) (pdf)
-
Staff Report: Revised Phase 3 Engagement Plan, Work Plan and Budget (January 31, 2022) (1.12 MB) (pdf)
-
Staff Report: OCP Review - Revised Phase 2 Report and Revised Phase 3 Engagement Plan (November 22, 2021)
-
Staff Report: October 18, 2021 OCP Review Next Steps (528 KB) (pdf)
-
Staff Report: August 16, 2021 OCP Change Order #5 (1.16 MB) (pdf)
-
Staff Report: July 12, 2021 OCP Phase 2 Summary Report and Next Steps (15.4 MB) (pdf)
-
Staff Report: Dec 14, 2020 - OCP Review Phase 1 Summary (10.7 MB) (pdf)
-
Staff Report: Sept 14, 2020 - High Level Work Plan, Engagement Strategy and Terms of Reference for the OCP Advisory Working Group (1.48 MB) (pdf)
-
Staff Report: Jul 13, 2020 - OCP Review Evaluation of Proposals (705 KB) (pdf)
-
Staff Report: May 25, 2020 - Official Community Plan – Request For Proposal (10.6 MB) (pdf)
-
Staff Report: Mar 2, 2020 - OCP Scope & Proposed Approach (10.5 MB) (pdf)
-
-
OCP AWG Meeting Materials
-
2022-07-20-AWG Meeting#11 Notes (DRAFT) (295 KB) (pdf)
-
2022-07-20-AWG Meeting #11 Slides (3.3 MB) (pdf)
-
2022-07-20-AWG Meeting #11 Agenda (192 KB) (pdf)
-
2022-05-25-AWG Meeting #10 Notes Dialogue Session (358 KB) (pdf)
-
2022-05-25 AWG Meeting #10 Slides (12.9 MB) (pdf)
-
2022-05-25_AWG Meeting #10 Agenda (192 KB) (pdf)
-
2022-04-20-AWG Meeting #9 Notes (279 KB) (pdf)
-
2022-04-20-AWG Meeting #9 Slides (2.28 MB) (pdf)
-
2022-04-20_AWG Meeting #9 Agenda (10.3 MB) (pdf)
-
2021-11-10 AWG Meeting #8 Notes (266 KB) (pdf)
-
2021-11-10 AWG Meeting #8 Slides (4.68 MB) (pdf)
-
2021-11-10 AWG Meeting#8 Agenda (75.5 MB) (pdf)
-
2021-10-21 AWG Meeting #7 Notes (246 KB) (pdf)
-
2021-10-21 AWG Meeting#7 Slides (1.24 MB) (pdf)
-
2021-10-21 AWG Meeting#7 Agenda (127 KB) (pdf)
-
2021-09-15 AWG Meeting#6 Notes (190 KB) (pdf)
-
2021-09-15-AWG Meeting#6 Agenda (127 KB) (pdf)
-
2021-06-24 AWG Meeting#5 Notes (186 KB) (pdf)
-
2021-06-24 AWG Meeting#5 PowerPoint (60.6 MB) (pdf)
-
2021-06-24 AWG Meeting#5 Agenda (133 KB) (pdf)
-
2021-04-14 AWG Meeting#4 Notes (214 KB) (pdf)
-
2021-04-14 AWG Meeting#4 PowerPoint (22.3 MB) (pdf)
-
2021-04-14 AWG Meeting#4 Agenda (145 KB) (pdf)
-
2021-02-25 AWG Meeting#3 Notes (176 KB) (pdf)
-
2021-02-25 AWG Meeting#3 Agenda (133 KB) (pdf)
-
2021-02-25 AWG Meeting#3 PowerPoint (178 KB) (pdf)
-
2021-01-13 AWG Composition Summary (142 KB) (pdf)
-
2020-12-15 AWG Amended ToR and Memo (358 KB) (pdf)
-
2020-12-03 AWG Meeting#2 Notes (153 KB) (pdf)
-
2020-12-03 AWG Meeting#2 PowerPoint (4.06 MB) (pdf)
-
2020-12-03 AWG Meeting#2 Agenda (141 KB) (pdf)
-
2020-11-12 AWG Meeting#1 Notes (132 KB) (pdf)
-
2020-11-12 AWG Meeting#1 PowerPoint (473 KB) (pdf)
-
2020-11-12 AWG Meeting#1 Agenda (136 KB) (pdf)
-
OCP Advisory Working Group Terms of Reference.pdf (128 KB) (pdf)
-
-
Official Community Plan Bylaw 1130 (2007) Consolidated Feb 2020 (1.1 MB) (pdf)
Project Timeline
-
Background Research and Project Scoping
Official Community Plan Review has finished this stageJuly - December 2020
This Phase of the OCP review is complete.
-
Visioning and Emerging Concepts
Official Community Plan Review has finished this stageJanuary - November 2021
This Phase of the OCP review is complete.
-
Drafting the OCP
Official Community Plan Review is currently at this stageMarch 2022 - 2023
This is the current stage of the OCP review.
-
Finalize the Plan
this is an upcoming stage for Official Community Plan ReviewThis is an upcoming stage for the OCP review.
-
Bylaw Approval Process
this is an upcoming stage for Official Community Plan ReviewThis is an upcoming stage for the OCP review.
FAQs
- What is an Official Community Plan?
- Why does the OCP need to be updated?
- Why will the OCP review take years to complete?
- How can I get involved?
- How does the OCP affect me?
- How will other initiatives contribute to the OCP?
- What is the OCP Advisory Working Group?
- Why is the District planning for new housing when we are a rural community?
- How does an OCP help us reach community goals?
- What if there was no OCP?
- Who uses an OCP?
- What is the difference between the Official Community Plan and the Zoning Bylaw?
- How do other regional and municipal plans relate to the District's OCP?
- What areas are currently outside of the Regional Growth Strategy (RGS)? What are the District's options in relation to the RGS policy areas?
- When was the District's OCP last updated?
- Why is public input needed?
- Can you explain the difference between the Rural designation in the current OCP as outlined in Land Use Scenario 1 compared to the Rural Residential designation as outlined in Land Use Scenario 3?
- Where can I find definitions that are associated with the policy directions such as for neighbourhood nook, circular economy, blue-green networks, Green Shores, agricultural food hub and farm village?
- What are some of the regulatory and policy mechanisms the District can consider to limit (or attract the intended) the types of commercial activities occur in a "neighbourhood nook"?
- What are some of the regulatory and policy mechanisms that the District can consider to limit secondary dwellings to a “cottage” as envisioned?
- How was it determined to explore cottages on lots 1400m2 (0.3 acres) and greater?
- What are clam gardens and are there specific areas they would be considered?
- What is the current Area 1 (McTavish) and where is the boundary being considered to be expanded through Land Use Scenario 2? Why is a change proposed?
- What is the risk of having lands that are outside of the Regional Growth Strategy (Area 1 & Area 2)?
- What are all the options that could be considered for the areas that are currently outside of Regional Growth Strategy Area 1 (McTavish) & Area 2 (Tsehum)?
- What is the difference between the mixed uses (commercial and residential) at the McTavish Village as opposed to the Deep Cove Community Hub?
- Where can I find more information on Green Shores?
- How have First Nations been involved in the OCP review? Where is that feedback?
Virtual Open House May 31, 2022 - Phase 3
Web Panel Recordings
-
Click here to play video Web Panel 1: Climate Action and Natural Systems This is a recording of the Web Panel on Climate Action and Natural Systems from February 2, 2021.
-
Click here to play video Web Panel 2: Healthy Communities, Housing and Affordability This is a recording of the Web Panel on Healthy Communities, Housing and Affordability from February 3, 2021.
-
Click here to play video Web Panel 3: Agriculture and the Local Economy This is a recording of the Web Panel on Agriculture and the Local Economy from February 4, 2021.
Who's Listening
-
Project Lead
Phone 250-656-0781 Email planning@northsaanich.ca